JAKARTA, iNews.id – Executive Director Poltracking Indonesia Hanta Yuda assessed the Perception Ethics Council's decision on the results supervision the institution is related to the pair of candidates for governor and deputy governor (cagub-cawagub) Jakarta on Regional elections Jakarta 2024 is legally flawed. Both formally and materially.

According to Hanta, the Ethics Council was unable to verify the survey method used due to alleged discrepancies in the raw data.

“The Ethics Council's decision is legally and materially flawed. “The Ethics Council claimed that there were two different sets of raw data, which actually drifted, as if Poltracking provided inconsistent data,” said Hanta, Friday (8/11/2024).

Hanta emphasized that the data sent by Poltracking had no differences or variations. Instead, he analyzed the Perception Ethics Board's ability to assess the validity of the data.

According to him, the allegation that there are two different data sets is unfounded because the data is actually identical even though there may be technical differences in format.

“The data we send is the same and in accordance with the SOP we have. “Surprisingly, we were not given an explanation regarding the SOP or the validity of the data in question, instead we were immediately subject to sanctions without a clear explanation,” said Hanta.



Source link